On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 13:20 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> Interesting problem... the bug is in get_op_btree_interpretation() which
> has code like this:
> 
>   /*                                                                          
>                        
>    * If we can't find any opfamily containing the op, perhaps it is a
> <>                             
>    * operator.  See if it has a negator that is in an
> opfamily.                                      
>    */
>   op_negated = false;
>   if (catlist->n_members == 0)
> 
> 
> However, that's a bogus test, because btree_gist puts <> into an
> opfamily. Thus, catlist->n_members == 1 even though we really do need to
> look for the negator. Really, we need to unconditionally search for the
> operator as well as unconditionally searching for the negator.

Patch attached.

Regards,
        Jeff Davis

Attachment: rowcmp.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Reply via email to