Alexey Klyukin <al...@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> On Aug 29, 2011, at 5:02 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>
>> Alexey Klyukin <al...@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Function calls can appear in the FROM clause. (This is
>>> especially useful for functions that return result sets, but any
>>> function can be used.) This acts as though its output were
>>> created as a temporary table for the duration of this single
>>> SELECT command.
>>
>> It doesn't say that operators which provide equivalent
>> functionality to functions can also be used.
>
> I agree, but why is it possible to use the type casting with CAST
> there?
Because the syntax is that of a function, which is allowed.
> Doesn't this break the promise of equivalency between the
> 'CAST .. ' and '::'?
No. Equivalent functionality doesn't imply that the different
syntax forms can be used in the same places; just that they do the
same thing when used. This is hardly unique to casting.
Comparison of two text values is done through the texteq function.
test=# select val from texteq('a', 'a') as val;
val
-----
t
(1 row)
test=# select val from 'a' = 'a' as val;
ERROR: syntax error at or near "'a'"
LINE 1: select val from 'a' = 'a' as val;
^
test=# select val from (select 'a' = 'a') as val;
val
-----
(t)
(1 row)
> select val from CAST(random() as integer) as val;
> val
> -----
> 1
> (1 row)
Right. A function is allowed as a from_item. Arbitrary expressions
using operators which happen to provide equivalent services are not.
-Kevin
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
