> Seems you have a sequence called "new"; seems we don't handle that > well.
Hmmm ... yes, you're correct. Idiot users. Interestingly, the sequence is no problem until 9.0. 8.4 handled it fine. I'd guess this is another example of where merging in plpgsql broke something. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
