> But now that we allow it it'd be nice if it actually worked :-(. > Looking into the archives I see that we were mainly thinking about > the possibility of exclusion constraints naming the same column > more than once, which may explain why nobody tried using such an > index for queries. I'll see about fixing this in HEAD, although > my initial guess is that it will be too invasive to back-patch.
I didn't recognized the exclusion constraint feature before. But it looks interesting. Thank you for your effort. Christian -- NEU: FreePhone - 0ct/min Handyspartarif mit Geld-zurück-Garantie! Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
