On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 11:32:40AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > Should this be back-patched? (Problem first reported in PG 9.1 due to > > the removal of a backward-compatibility symlink.) I am not sure we have > > had enough problem reports to warrant it (3 reports). > > We back-patch a lot of things based on a single report. Three is a lot.
OK, batckpatched to Postgres 9.1. I don't think anyone is still major release upgrading to 9.0 or earlier. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
