Am 18.11.2012 um 19:36 schrieb Peter Geoghegan <pe...@2ndquadrant.com>:
> On 18 November 2012 18:18, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Well, we have two reports of people trying such values (assuming that >> #7545 actually is the same thing), and it didn't work for either of >> them. I don't think it's a problem to restrict the value to something >> that will work rather than fail. > > Right. sizeof(int) is very probably 4 on all platforms that we > support. I see no problem with the proposal. Have you cross-checked this on a 64bit platform vs. a 32 bit platform? e.g. on Linux i386 vs. Linux amd64? > > -- > Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ > PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs Freundliche Grüsse, micro systems Marc Balmer -- Marc Balmer micro systems, Wiesendamm 2a, Postfach, 4019 Basel fon +41 61 383 05 10, fax +41 61 383 05 12, http://www.msys.ch/ -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
