Stephen Frost <[email protected]> writes:
> * [email protected] ([email protected]) wrote:
>> It seems that documentation wrong or [ CASCADE | RESTRICT ] feature of ALTER
>> TYPE ... RENAME TO isn't implemented.
> Actually, I'm pretty sure it's implemented but the grammar for it was
> broken during refactoring to have all the ALTER .. RENAME operations go
> through the same code paths.
Are we sure the documentation's not wrong? A quick test says this
syntax isn't accepted in *any* existing release, and I can't say I
understand what it should do anyway.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
