On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 06:43:19PM +0000, dennis.noord...@helsinki.fi wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
> 
> Bug reference:      8469
> Logged by:          Dennis
> Email address:      dennis.noord...@helsinki.fi
> PostgreSQL version: 9.3.0
> Operating system:   FreeBSD 9.2-RC4
> Description:        
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> After upgrading an 8.1 version to 9.3.0 I am suddenly seeing text fields
> containing "&" where they are populated from XML. This may be a
> coincidence and the problem may have existed earlier, in any case, now I
> noticed.
> 
> 
> I extract the text content of XML nodes using xpath, from something like:
> 
> 
> <name>Jones &amp; Smith</name>
> 
> 
> The reason I end up with "&amp;" is the IMHO rather odd xpath behaviour:
> 
> 
> # select xpath('/a/text()', (select xmlelement(name "a", 'A & B')));
> 
> 
>      xpath     
> ---------------
>  {"A &amp; B"}
> 
> 
> The canonical contents of "a" is "A & B". At first search I've found some
> rather heated debates about this with bits of name calling; I certainly do
> not want to get into that and I apologize in advance to those who feel very
> strongly about this.
> 
> 
> I've seen one "fix" describe the problem as:
> 
> 
> ""DESCRIPTION: Submitter invokes following statement:
> SELECT (XPATH('/*/text()', '<root>&lt;</root>'))[1].
> He expect (escaped) result "&lt;", but gets "<"
> """
> 
> 
> With respect, this "bug" makes no sense as this produces in fact the right
> result. The actual value of <root> is "<", it's just escaped when serialized
> to XML. If <root> were to actually contain "&lt;", it'd be serialized as
> "&amp;lt;". It should not be possible to be blindly cast to a text type, but
> explicitly serialized as such.
> 
> 
> At least the reviewer at:
> 
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/201106291934.23089.rsmog...@softperience.eu

There are two other similar bug reports on this from February and March
of this year:

        
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e1u1fkl-0002rd...@wrihigleys.postgresql.org
        
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e1uhyuw-0001oj...@wrigleys.postgresql.org

Someone who knows XML needs to take leadership on this and propose a
patch.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Reply via email to