Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> OK.  Please send in a patch to either do that or switch this call to use
>> noError = false.  Or possibly both: shouldn't there be some other signal
>> path that tells the worker whether instrumentation is needed?  I'll
>> leave it alone pending your investigation.

> Here's a patch do to both.

LGTM, pushed.

                        regards, tom lane

Reply via email to