Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> OK. Please send in a patch to either do that or switch this call to use >> noError = false. Or possibly both: shouldn't there be some other signal >> path that tells the worker whether instrumentation is needed? I'll >> leave it alone pending your investigation.
> Here's a patch do to both.
LGTM, pushed.
regards, tom lane
