Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: >> Yea, that works for me. I wonder if we should choose an absurd sentinel >> value to prevent code from relying on one? 0x0000beef or such. Unless >> somebody protests soon-ish I'll make it so.
> Pushed that way (with 0x5EED as the value, seems more appropriate ;)). LGTM, thanks! > I can't convince any of my compilers to actual emit warnings in this > case, so we'll have to see whether prairiedog like this... Per my results yesterday, locust and coypu were also complaining; one of them might come back quicker. regards, tom lane