On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Portability fix for commit 9a895462d. > > So far as I can find, NI_MAXHOST isn't actually required anywhere by > POSIX. Nonetheless, commit 9a895462d supposed that it could rely on > having that symbol without any ceremony at all. We do have a hack > for providing it if the platform doesn't, in getaddrinfo.h, so fix > the problem by #including that file. Per buildfarm.
Thanks for fixing my mistake. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
