On 18 April 2018 at 07:26, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > David Rowley wrote: > >> I've made another pass over the nodeAppend.c code and I'm unable to >> see what might cause this, although I did discover a bug where >> first_partial_plan is not set taking into account that some subplans >> may have been pruned away during executor init. The only thing I think >> this would cause is for parallel workers to not properly help out with >> some partial plans if some earlier subplans were pruned. I can see no >> reason for this to have caused this particular issue since the >> first_partial_plan would be 0 with and without the attached fix. > > Pushed this.
Thanks! -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services