Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> Are there arguments for doing this in postgres.h rather than c.h?
No, c.h is the correct place. The core problem is that we have to include
pg_config.h before <stdio.h> et al in order to have consistent libc APIs
(on platforms where this matters), and c.h is what does that.
> I think we shouldn't do this for v11, as it seems likely that some
> extensions would be broken. While not hard to fix, that seems
> unnecessary after beta1? Seems unlikely we'll introduce further cases
> before new features are merged.
Yeah, waiting for v12 seems fine.
regards, tom lane
