On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 04:12:23PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2018-Jul-03, Andres Freund wrote: > > > On 2018-07-03 15:13:20 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > Are the numerical values actually exposed to the world? I thought the > > > only way to this info was through the system views, which surely expose > > > the names, not the numbers. > > > > There's at least some work at high frequency sampling of these, and I > > assume that's not going through SQL, but rather C functions. > > You're right.
My take is a background worker which connects to shared memory and scans directly ProcArray entries. > Anyway, it's not a huge deal to me. If Michael doesn't want to > backpatch it, it's his call, and I don't have the cycles to do it myself > right now either. If some other committer cares about it, well ... New wait events on HEAD are adapted to HEAD in my opinion, so I would keep the code as it is now. If anybody wishes to back-patch the change, of course feel free to do so. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
