On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 05:47:47PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I didn't want to backpatch further than v11 without a test case that would > work in those branches, and I lacked one. If you've got out-of-core code > you could verify it with, please do that and back-patch further.
Was there any need to patch v11 with that actually? As there is nothing which needs except HEAD that does not seem strictly necessary. I have reviewed the modules I have, and actually it seems that I would not need much of that for a back-patch. One reason being that most of my TAP tests need pg_regress so as nodes can be initialized so this needs an external installation anyway. Maybe others have more thoughts to offer and would prefer a back-patch. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
