On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 11:22:55AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I'm surprised you didn't back-patch this --- isn't it a bug fix? > > A compromise might be to push it to v11 but not further.
Yes, that's clearly a bug fix from pg_ctl point of view with TAP tests. However, I have rather cold feet about back-patching for two reasons as this introduces a behavior change: - The concurrency part disappears. - Caller of open() needs to enforce text mode to strip correctly CRLF characters. I would be fine to get that into v11 though, as that is not released yet. You will have to wait for a couple of days though, there is a long week-end here away from laptops and electronic devices ;) -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
