On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 1:47 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > This flips one expected result to another order from what it was. > (I experimented with OID-descending sort, but that flips two > other expected results.)
I think that that's fine, provided that the order is consistent going forward. > If no objections, I'll push shortly. Sounds good. -- Peter Geoghegan
