On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 04:20:40PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2019-May-06, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > docs: fist draft version of the PG 12 release notes > > Hello, thanks for doing this work once again. > > Typo in surname: "Golgov" is Dolgov.
Yes, it was "Golgov" in one commint and "Dolgov" in another; I change it to "Dolgov". > This entry: > Allow foreign keys to reference partitioned tables (Alvaro Herrera) > says "LIMITATIONS?" but I don't think there are any of significance. > You can now reference unique/PKs that appear in partitioned tables, > period. Just remove the LIMITATIONS should do it ;-) Done. > This is a bit misleading: > > Remove the special behavior of OID columns (Andres Freund, John Naylor) > > Previously, a normally-invisible OID column could be specified > during table creation using WITH OIDS; that ability has been > removed. Columns can still be explicitly specified as type OID. > pg_dump and pg_upgrade operations on databases using WITH OIDS will > need adjustment. Many system tables now have an 'oid' column that > will be expanded with SELECT * by default. > > "databases using WITH OIDS will need adjustment". In reality, many > databases carried over by pg_upgrade from old versions will need > adjustment, since old tables had oids by default. This could be more > troublesome than the current wording suggest. Maybe use something like > "... operations on databases containing tables with the oid system > column will need adjustment", so that users have to research whether > they have them or not. If we only say WITH OIDS then people will think > they've never used that clause so they must not worry. Yes, I reworded it: http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-12.html > > Specify a range of oids (9000-9999) to be used for external > extensions (Andres Freund) > > I'm not sure that "specify" is the right verb to use for this one. > Nothing better comes to mind ATM ... I used "Reserve". -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +