On 2019-Jun-14, Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: > >> Hm, I don't get that warning. Does this patch silence it, please? > > > Uh, no patch attached? But initializing the variable where it's > > declared would certainly silence it. > > BTW, after looking around a bit I wonder if this complaint isn't > exposing an actual logic bug. Shouldn't skip_tuple_lock have > a lifetime similar to first_time?
I think you're right. I should come up with a test case that exercises that case. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
