Hi čt 15. 8. 2019 v 21:22 odesílatel Tom Lane <[email protected]> napsal:
> > > I'm slightly hesitant to back-patch this into v11, because it changes > the contents of struct PLpgSQL_type as well as the signature of > plpgsql_build_datatype(), so in principle it could break code that is > poking into the innards of plpgsql. However, the only popular extension > of that ilk is pldebugger, and it doesn't seem to be affected. Since > this is a regression for people who were relying on the old behavior, > it seems worth taking the small risk of causing compatibility issues. > > > this change breaks compilation plpgsql_check extension. https://github.com/okbob/plpgsql_check Backpatching changed plpgsql_build_datatype was not good idea. Now, I have not a idea how to ensure compilation on 11 and higher Can you add some symbol to source code, so four parameters of plpgsql_build_datatype should be used? Regards Pavel
