On 2019-09-06 15:28, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> writes: >> On 2019-09-01 23:34, Tom Lane wrote: >>> So did the old wording, it seemed to me. I'm happy to remove the sentence >>> altogether if there's no reason to be pushing people away from MinGW. >>> Should we also rethink the sentence I added at the top of the chapter, >>> pointing Windows people to chapter 17? > >> Yeah, I suggest this: >> ... > > Hm, I'm tempted to also drop the sentence about the "ready-made installer" > then. It doesn't particularly belong here, and the only way to read it > is as a nudge to not use the MinGW build process.
Agreed, it seems out of place there. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
