Michael Paquier <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 09:54:23AM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> We'd also have to come to this magic actual agreement on which such >> fields we *want* :) Which alone would be an improvement.
> Well, there has been some discussion about this matter on the lists > not so long ago: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CABUevEzauoMm3irCyg4s=vux5huckmtw_r69fiks4+72gzy...@mail.gmail.com > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ca+hukgjr+ytzudq9_6cfsqcrh_fvfumddzgmilwxbhcrtju...@mail.gmail.com > And it seems to me that the only consensus we reached was about having > "Discussion:", while the other tags were not that popular. Yeah, that's my understanding of the state of affairs too: a Discussion: link is expected if relevant, but whether you want to express other info as a tag or free text is committer's choice. regards, tom lane
