On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 01:42:38PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 11:08:45AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 11:57:39AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> Why was this backpatched?
> >
> > Uh, why not? There have been requests to keep the docs as consistent as
> > possible in back branches.
>
> Because this is a cosmetic-only change and not something user-visible,
> so it may be surprising to see it back-patched. I was a bit surprised
> first, but after looking at it I don't have any problem with what you
> did, and you actually made the effort to back-patch it.
I use doc backpatching logic we discussed in this 2018 thread:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CABUevEyumGh3r05U3_mhRrEU%3DdfacdRr2HEw140MvN7FSBMSyw%40mail.gmail.com#6a92eb3360700dd4d2d392d2b91021ba
--
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
