On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 3:16 AM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > I've concluded that this is probably a compiler bug. It doesn't fail > at optimization level -O0 or -O2, only -O1; and trying to step through > gen_partprune_steps_internal() suggests that the part_scheme local > variable is changing value, which it surely should not. Since gaur > is running an ancient gcc version, and -O1 is doubtless a pretty > under-tested optimization level, bugs there are not so surprising. > > There wasn't any amazingly good reason to be using -O1 for gaur, > so I've switched the animal to use -O2. I expect it'll go back > to green in a few hours.
I checked that gaur got back to green. Thanks! Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
