On 11/10/20 3:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]> writes: >> On 11/9/20 5:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> What I have in mind to apply to 9.5 through 13 is per attached. >> You also need to modify first_el_agg_any. > ... doh. That one is a little messier because there's no equally useful > substitute function. What I'm inclined to do for that is to add a > SQL-language wrapper to reproduce the old signature for array_append. > As attached. (I'm keeping this separate from the other patch, since > this doesn't go back as far.) > >
Seems reasonable. cheers andrew
