On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:27 AM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Strongly agree. I hadn't realized that the patch actually *removed* > the index reloption, rather than just turning it into a no-op. I think > that's a complete nonstarter. It will break pg_upgrade scenarios where > users have indexes with that option set. It's an especially bad idea > to have done it in a stable branch, but I doubt we can get away with > it even in HEAD.
But I haven't removed the index reloption (or the GUC of the same name) on the 13 branch. I just made it a no-op there, and removed the documentation. Evidently there is a consensus that the reloption should not have been removed on HEAD. I'll discuss that on the other -committers thread now. -- Peter Geoghegan
