On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 07:42:45AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Well that unsticks the test, so now it fails in an ordinary way, so +1 > for doing that. I must say that --no-loop seems a little ill-designed. > Effectively we have to choose between zero loops and infinite loops. > But that seems to be a matter of ancient (or at least medieval) history.
Okay, done. We could add an option that defines a number of failures, though I have yet to see a use for that in the field. > I will see if a more modern zlib helps matters. Thanks! -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
