On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 11:11:37AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 06.09.22 08:27, Michael Paquier wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 01:57:53AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > > > > I think renumbering this makes sense. We could just leave the comment > > > > as is if we don't come up with a better wording. > > > > > > +1, I see no need to change the comment. We just need to establish > > > the precedent that values within the GUC_UNIT_MEMORY field can be > > > chosen sequentially. > > > > +1. > > committed without the comment change
Thank you
