Thomas Munro <tmu...@postgresql.org> writes:
> Small tidyup for commit d41a178b.
> A comment was left behind claiming that we needed to use malloc() rather
> than palloc() because the corresponding free would run in another
> thread, but that's not true anymore. Remove that comment. And, with
> the reason being gone, we might as well actually use palloc().
Hm, doesn't the change to palloc make the following error check redundant?
childinfo = palloc(sizeof(win32_deadchild_waitinfo));
- if (!childinfo)
- ereport(FATAL,
- (errcode(ERRCODE_OUT_OF_MEMORY),
- errmsg("out of memory")));
-
childinfo->procHandle = pi.hProcess;
childinfo->procId = pi.dwProcessId;
regards, tom lane
