On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 1:05 PM Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: > > I concur with the upthread objection that it is way too late in > > the release cycle to be introducing a breaking change like this. > > I request that you revert it. > > The timing was not great, but this is fixing a purported defect in an older > v16 feature. If the MAINTAIN privilege is actually fine, we're all set for > v16. If MAINTAIN does have a material problem that $SUBJECT had fixed, we > should either revert MAINTAIN, un-revert $SUBJECT, or fix the problem a > different way.
I wonder why this commit used pg_catalog, pg_temp rather than just the empty string, as AutoVacWorkerMain does. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
