These new tests introduced a few new calls of the md5() function. This should be avoided (see commit 208bf364a9). You can replace these easily with the fipshash() function instead, but I think you then also need to change some of the constants in the tests. Could you look at this again?

On 02.07.23 10:34, Tomas Vondra wrote:
Improve BRIN minmax-multi opclass test coverage

Per the code coverage report, the existing regression tests did not
exercice some a couple important BRIN minmax-multi code paths.

- The tests focused on testing planning with a range of scan key
   strategies, but not the execution. Fixed by adding queries that
   actually test query execution for both equality and inequality.

- All tests created indexes after inserting data, but this only
   exercises the CREATE INDEX strategy that sees all values at once, not
   incremental summary updates. The new tests flip the order and create
   the index before adding data.

- The assert check(s) validating correctness of expanded ranges were
   present only in the "union" code path, which is not covered by
   regression tests at all (as it requires concurrency etc.). Fixed by
   adding the asserts to a couple more places.

Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas
Discussion: 
https://postgr.es/m/57020b2e-d9c9-9bc7-4892-b36d9bb07563%40enterprisedb.com

Branch
------
master

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/0457109344b46f481f9bf09b85674695ba57c8e4

Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/access/brin/brin_minmax_multi.c |   9 +
src/test/regress/expected/brin_multi.out    | 357 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
src/test/regress/sql/brin_multi.sql         | 165 +++++++++++++
3 files changed, 531 insertions(+)




Reply via email to