On 27.07.24 00:24, Michael Paquier wrote:
Fix more holes with SLRU code in need of int64 for segment numbers
This is a continuation of 3937cadfd438, taking care of more areas I have
managed to miss previously.
Reported-by: Noah Misch
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240724130059.1f.nmi...@google.com
Backpatch-through: 17
Branch
------
master
Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/c9e24573905bef7fc3e4efb02bdb4d0cc8e43c51
I don't understand this patch. The previous patches that this
references changed various variables to int64 and made adjustments
following from that. But this patch takes variables and function
results that are of type int and casts them to unsigned long long before
printing. I don't see what that accomplishes, and it's not clear based
on just the explanation that this is a continuation of a previous patch
that doesn't do that. Is there a plan to change these things to int64
as well at some point?
