Expand comment on the slot recheck in drop_local_obsolete_slots().

The existing comment explained that a user-created slot could reuse the
same shared memory as 'local_slot' during the window between selecting a
slot to drop and locking its database, and that we therefore recheck
before dropping.  It did not, however, spell out the fuller consequence:
because local_slot points to a reusable slot-array entry, its fields may
already describe a replacement slot, so the earlier drop decision and the
slot_database used for locking could relate to an unrelated slot/database.

Expand the comment to describe this, and note that the recheck prevents
us from dropping a user-created replacement slot while the residual risk
(such as briefly locking an unrelated database) is confined to the cycle
and is acceptable given the race is rare and non-fatal.

No functional change.

Author: Fujii Masao <[email protected]>
Author: Xuneng Zhou <[email protected]>
Author: Amit Kapila <[email protected]>
Discussion: 
https://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwGGyEDL3dh7uJ6qPsGvnq4QK_R8+U=12caprnzwrwa...@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: 
https://postgr.es/m/cahgqgwhqq1ppvffykvxlfryc-byrdwsn0neahj9slyv97oo...@mail.gmail.com

Branch
------
master

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/6b41bd1a459cb457cbb51d021b70004646d78db0

Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/replication/logical/slotsync.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Reply via email to