On Thu, 9 Jul 2026 at 04:11, Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 05:43:01PM +0000, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > > Switch to pg_atomic_uint32 for the fields. Seems easier to reason > > about than volatile pointers. There was some precedence for that, as > > were already using pg_atomic_uint32 for the procArrayGroupFirst and > > clogGroupFirst fields, which also store ProcNumbers. > > Since removing volatile qualifiers is on my mind, I noticed that this patch > makes it possible to remove two more. Patch attached.
+1
