On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 02:51:31PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > On 3 Sep 2026, at 14:49, Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> wrote: >> This is correct, but we have some precedent to pluralize these >> kinds of things anyway. Several reasons: >> >> - Translators shouldn't have to look into the source code what the >> - actual value is. (Or, in this case, even beyond the actual >> - source code.) >> >> - Maybe tomorrow someone changes this to PG_UINT16_MAX, and then >> - it might have to be translated differently. >> >> - Not in this specific case but in general: You might have the >> - same message in different contexts but with different numbers. > > Makes sense, thanks for explaining!
Commenting as the guy who has touched the trigger code and added this message. Thanks for the explanation, will keep that in mind. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
