> > "Hiroshi Inoue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Log message: > >> Seems like a bad idea that REINDEX TABLE supports (or > >> thinks it does) > >> reindexing system tables without ignoring system > >> indexes, > > > Why ? > > I'd ask the question the other way: why would it be a good > idea to allow > this in REINDEX TABLE and not in the other two cases? And > did it really > work?
Yes. I would revert your change. regards, Hiroshi Inoue ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
