Tom Lane writes: > > If it's only honored by SQL functions, then it should probably be called > > check_sql_function_bodies. > > I thought about that while I was making the patch, but decided that it > would be a very un-forward-looking name. Someday we will probably have > syntax-checking validators for plpgsql, etc.
The point of this feature is to avoid failures because of forward references in SQL code. A syntax-checking validator in anything but possibly plpgsql will not even look at SQL code, so a validator for a different language will only gain pain and confusion by respecting this parameter. Perhaps it needs to different name altogether, along the lines of "do not check SQL code in functions". -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
