Tom Lane writes: > Our alternatives would be to add enough ORDER BY clauses to constrain > the results (which I don't want to do because it would limit the set > of join plans testable by the tests), or to add another result file > for this test. I'd be in favor of the latter if there were more than > one platform showing this behavior, or if I thought that UnixWare's > behavior wouldn't change again next time SCO decides to tweak qsort.
Fair enough. I just thought, reading your commit message, that you had set out to completely fix it. I say we leave it as is for now. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
