[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> Attached is a patch that addressed all the discussed issues that
> did not break backward compatability,
Was this patch actually agreed to? I hadn't gotten around to looking
at it because I thought Peter was still objecting to the whole idea.
> including the ability to
> output ISO-8601 compliant intervals by setting datestyle to
> iso8601basic.
This is a horrid, horrid idea. Datestyle is already a complete mess
because it is being used to control several things; it should have been
two or possibly three GUC variables not one. Sticking in yet another
behavior is just not acceptable IMHO, especially when it's defined as
non-orthogonally as that.
Please revert that part of the patch and instead invent a new GUC
variable that's specifically for interval formatting.
BTW, I can tell without looking that the patch is deficient in
documentation; if it has effects on GUC variables, why is there no
mod in runtime.sgml?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
