Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [ scratches head... ]  I don't see why we'd get different results.
> I see four warnings about undeclared functions in read.c if the
> inclusion isn't there.  Is there perhaps some change in your sources
> that you missed committing?

Bizarre -- upon reversing your change to read.c and recompiling, I now
get the warnings. I could have sworn that I'd double-checked that I'd
fixed the necessary dependencies for the value node change, but
apparently not.

Mea culpa, and sorry for the sloppiness.

-Neil


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to