Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it worth adding one of those readonly GUC vars for XLOG_SEG_SIZE then?
[shrug...] Maybe. I just did it because we've seen one or two requests
about whether the size of the WAL overhead can be reduced for small
installations. I'm not sure it's something people will do regularly.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
