Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 8/7/2004 12:47 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What? If there was consensus to do this, I missed it. If there was
>> even any *discussion* of doing this, I missed it.
> How many questions about vacuum still grabbing all available bandwidth,
> vacuum slowing down the whole system, vacuum being all evil do you want
> to answer for 8.0? Over and over again we are defending reasonable
> default configuration values against gazillions of little switches, and
> this is a reasonable default that will be a relief for large databases
> and makes more or less no difference for small ones.
What basis do you have for saying that this is a reasonable default?
Does anyone else agree?
Again, it's the lack of discussion that is bothering me.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
