On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 16:04, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I prefer strlen() myself but Tom prefers sizeof(). In the long run I > would like to create a 'sizeof' that doesn't include the null as a > global define that we can use for any hard-coded string.
Tom, can you elaborate on why you prefer sizeof()? ISTM that a decent compiler will evaluate the strlen() at compile-time if the argument is a compile-time constant. GCC will do this (even at -O0!), for example. -Neil ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
