Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> I hope this does not indicate that you are planning to commit that patch > >> on the day before RC1. > > > I am applying it. It was added to the queue yesterday or the day > > before. I don't consider it a feature addition but rather an addition > > for portability with Win32. I don't see how it affects anything unless > > you use that encoding. > > If it contains any core-dump-grade bugs, it can be used to cause denial > of service on any platform. And how can you possibly not consider it a > feature addition? > > I'll hold still for now, but if I see so much as one compiler warning > out of it, it's going away again.
Well, it is of less risk than the vacuum changes you made earlier this week that caused regression failures. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
