Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Dienstag, 14. Dezember 2004 14:10 schrieb Bruce Momjian: > > Did you look at the patch? To support it would require us to use a > > special CC setting for all cases where we are linking to a threaded > > libpq. I don't think we want to add that ugliness to our code just to > > support it, just like we didn't do a similar change to support threading > > on unixware. > > Maybe we are just having different notions of "supported". I think people > can > already set CC and CFLAGS themselves to get all-threaded builds. And that is > supported, I think, because we allow users to set CC and CFLAGS. If we write > "cc_r is not supported", then we might shut out users where we don't have to. > > As I said, one user already reported to have used it.
OK, text updated: # Supporting cc_r would require a special CC in all places that # use libpq, and that is ugly, so we don't do it. Users can still # define their compiler as cc_r to do thread builds of everything. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
