>
> That might be taking the notion of bug-compatibility with PL/SQL
> a bit too far. For that matter, did you check whether Oracle
> actually treats it as a procedure-scope variable? Try having the
> exception block call another function and trap an error inside that.
> Does SQLCODE change in the calling function?
>
good shot. Its more like session (global) variable.
create function foo2
return integer
as
begin
dbms_output.put_line('10: '||SQLCODE||' -> '||SQLERRM);
raise_application_error(-20003, 'Third exception');
end;
change of foo
dbms_output.put_line('3: '||SQLCODE||' -> '||SQLERRM);
--raise_application_error(-20002, 'Second exception');
f := foo2;
exception when others then
dbms_output.put_line('4: '||SQLCODE||' -> '||SQLERRM);
end;
and result:
1: 0 -> ORA-0000: normal, successful completion
2: -20001 -> ORA-20001: First exception
3: -20001 -> ORA-20001: First exception
10: -20001 -> ORA-20001: First exception
4: -20003 -> ORA-20003: Third exception
5: 0 -> ORA-0000: normal, successful completion
6: 0 -> ORA-0000: normal, successful completion
foo2 knows first exception. Is it bug? Maybe. The exception was outside
function, not in function and expected value of SQLCODE is zero.
Pavel
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
