On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:50:49PM -0300, Tom Lane wrote: > Log Message: > ----------- > Implement a preliminary 'template' facility for procedural languages, > as per my recent proposal.
Yay! > For now the template data is hard-wired in proclang.c --- this > should be replaced later by a new shared system catalog, but we > don't want to force initdb during 8.1 beta. Wouldn't beta be the time to do it? I know we define initdb-forcing changes to mean a major version bump, but I also thought that beta was a time to find the places where such changes make sense. Has there been a guarantee that beta means "no initdb" in previous releases? Just my $.02. Cheers, D -- David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778 Remember to vote! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
