Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2005-12-10 at 18:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> We do however have here a New Coding Rule that's good for all parts
>> of the backend: if you are accessing a spinlock-protected data structure
>> then you should be using a volatile-qualified pointer for it.
> I think this is worth documenting more clearly
BTW, forgot to reply to this part, but: have at it.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
