"Jackie Leng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, my question is why not just add a bms_intersect in the second occasion
> just like the first one? Do we need to change so much?
finalize_plan already has a bms_intersect, but it's further down in the
routine (to share code instead of duplicating it in each of the switch
cases) --- in CVS HEAD, line 1199. This is not relevant to the patch
AFAICS.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
