I like the new interface... it supports all the current Index Advisor
requirements, and probably the future requirements too.

I'll submit a new patch taking the current support routines into
consideration.

But I did not understand the haste to commit the patch within almost half an
hour of proposing the second version of the patch!!!
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gmail | hotmail | yahoo }.com

17°29'34.37"N  78°30'59.76"E - Hyderabad *
18°32'57.25"N  73°56'25.42"E - Pune

Sent from my BlackLaptop device

On 5/25/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Log Message:
-----------
Create hooks to let a loadable plugin monitor (or even replace) the
planner
and/or create plans for hypothetical situations; in particular,
investigate
plans that would be generated using hypothetical indexes.  This is a
heavily-rewritten version of the hooks proposed by Gurjeet Singh for his
Index Advisor project.  In this formulation, the index advisor can be
entirely a loadable module instead of requiring a significant part to be
in the core backend, and plans can be generated for hypothetical indexes
without requiring the creation and rolling-back of system catalog entries.

The index advisor patch as-submitted is not compatible with these hooks,
but it needs significant work anyway due to other 8.2-to-8.3 planner
changes.  With these hooks in the core backend, development of the advisor
can proceed as a pgfoundry project.

Modified Files:
--------------
    pgsql/src/backend/commands:
        explain.c (r1.163 -> r1.164)
        (
http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/commands/explain.c.diff?r1=1.163&r2=1.164
)
        prepare.c (r1.75 -> r1.76)
        (
http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/commands/prepare.c.diff?r1=1.75&r2=1.76
)
    pgsql/src/backend/executor:
        nodeBitmapIndexscan.c (r1.22 -> r1.23)
        (
http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapIndexscan.c.diff?r1=1.22&r2=1.23
)
        nodeIndexscan.c (r1.121 -> r1.122)
        (
http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexscan.c.diff?r1=1.121&r2=1.122
)
    pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/plan:
        planner.c (r1.219 -> r1.220)
        (
http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/plan/planner.c.diff?r1=1.219&r2=1.220
)
    pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/util:
        plancat.c (r1.134 -> r1.135)
        (
http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/util/plancat.c.diff?r1=1.134&r2=1.135
)
    pgsql/src/include/commands:
        explain.h (r1.30 -> r1.31)
        (
http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/include/commands/explain.h.diff?r1=1.30&r2=1.31
)
    pgsql/src/include/optimizer:
        plancat.h (r1.43 -> r1.44)
        (
http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/include/optimizer/plancat.h.diff?r1=1.43&r2=1.44
)
        planner.h (r1.39 -> r1.40)
        (
http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/include/optimizer/planner.h.diff?r1=1.39&r2=1.40
)

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to